Document 2156 DOCN M94A2156 TI Colleague responsibility in biological fluid exposures among health care workers (HCWs) in a general hospital. DT 9412 AU Chiodera A; Milini P; Tomasoni D; Gulletta M; Cristini G; Gussago A; Bonardi A; Signorini A; Carosi G; Univ. and Gen. Hosp., Brescia, Italy. SO Int Conf AIDS. 1994 Aug 7-12;10(1):369 (abstract no. PD0082). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ICA10/94370419 AB OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of co-workers of HCWs in occurrence of exposure to potentially infected biologic fluid among HCWs in a General Hospital and changes over a 4-year period. METHODS: All 785 exposures to biologic fluid (regardless the infective risk and occupation) which occurred in the period 1989-92 were subdivided in 3 types according to the main responsibility: of the PATIENT (A = patient movement, B = assault); of a COLLEAGUE (C = working together at the moment or D = absent and indefinite); of the HCW himself. N.A. = non assessable. RESULTS: TABULAR DATA, SEE ABSTRACT VOLUME. DISCUSSION: The HCW is fully responsible in 65.1% of cases, increasing in percentage during the period, but stable in absolute value. Second is the responsibility of an absent colleague (20.1%), regularly decreasing over time, both in percentage and in absolute value. In details colleague carelessness was responsible for exposures to sharp objects in waste bag (decreasing from 20 to 8), for too filled containers (from 10 to 4) and for unguarded needle (U.N.) (from 20 to 11). Because total exposures for U.N. in 1992 was 22, HCWs themselves were responsible for half of such cases. Even if the use of appropriate tools is satisfactory, efforts must continue to stress the importance of the Universal Precautions application. DE *Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional Human *Personnel, Hospital MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).